Typing of Fusobacterium necrophorum Strains Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Based Methods

Authors
A. Rahmati 1
J. Brazier 2
1 Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Anaerobic Reference Laboratory, NPHS Microbiology, Cardiff University Hospital of Wales, UK
Abstract
Background: Fusobacterium necrophorum as a non-spore-forming Gram-negative anaerobic bacillus is an important human and animal pathogen. It may cause severe systemic infections (Lemierre's syndrome) and some other infections. The aim of this study was to subtype Fusobacterium necrophorum by using PCR methods. Materials and Methods: Twenty five strains of Fusobacterium necrophorum subspecies funduliformis were used. Extraction of DNA and typing of the strains using REP-PCR, ERIC-PCR and BOX-PCR were done. Results: Molecular typing of Fusobacterium necrophorum using REP1-R-I and REP-2-I primers generated 2 to 5 amplicons ranging in size from 1500bp to 2000bp. GelCompar comparison of banding patterns revealed seven distinct ribotype strains from 25 strains tested of which most were 2 and 4 with 8 and 7 strains respectively. BOX-PCR subtyping generated 2 to 7 comparable amplicons ranging in size from approximately 600bp to more than 2000bp. ERIC-PCR subtyping generated 6 to 11 amplicons ranging in size from approximately 100bp to 1500bp. Conclusions: F. necrophorum strains have genomic variations that suggest they are never truly clonal in nature, or they may have undergone localized genetic variation across worldwide. This study also showed subtypes existing in Fusobacterium necrophorum species. We have demonstrated that Fusobacterium necrophorum REP-PCR types can be divided into seven, three subtypes by BOX-PCR and six subtypes by ERIC-PCR. BOX-PCR typing proved to be the most discriminatory method, yielding two-seven major bands. The sample size was too small to interpret statistically.

Keywords

  1. Jill E. Clarridge III. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004; 17(4): 840-62.

  2. Brooks GF, Carroll KC, Butell JS, Morse SA, Mietzner TA. Chapter 21, Infections caused by anaerobic bacteria in: Jawetz, Melnick & Adelbergs Medical Microbiology. 25th ed. McGraw Hill; 2010. p. 273-80.

  3. Kommedal Ø, Karlsen B, Sæbø Ø. Analysis of mixed sequencing chromatograms and its application in direct 16S rRNA sequencing of polymicrobial samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(11): 3766-71.

  4. Petti CA. Detection and identification of microorganism gene amplification and sequencing. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44(8): 1108-14.

  5. Hsu YP, Tsai SH, Li LY. Isolated septic arthritis of the Hip secondary to Fusobacterium necrophorum. Am J Med Sci. 2012; 343(3): 262-64.

  6. Gülmez D, Alp S, Topeli İskit A, Akova M, Hasçelik G. Pneumonia caused by Fusobacterium necrophorum: is lemierre syndrome still current?  Microbiol Bul. 2011; 45(4): 729-34.

  7. Terry R. Human infection with Fusobacterium necrophorum (Necrobacillosis), with a focus on Lemierre's syndrome. Clin Microbiol Rev.2007; 20(4): 622-56.

  8. Nozawa Y, Joshita S, Fukushima M, Sugiyama Y, Ichikawa Y, Kimura T, et al. A case of pyogenic liver abscess infected with Fusobacterium necrophorum depicted by microscopy and confirmed by tissue culture. Intern Med. 2011; 50(17): 1815-9.

  9. Yoneda M, Kato S, Mawatari H, Kirikoshi H, Imajo K, Fujita K, et al. Liver abscess caused by periodontal bacterial infection with Fusobacterium necrophorum. Hepatol Res. 2011; 41(2):194-6.

  10. Handler MZ, Miriovsky B, Gendelman HE, Sandkovsky U. Fusobacterium necrophorum causing infective endocarditis and liver and splenic abscesses. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2011; 53(3):169-72.

  11. Samant JS, Peacock JE Jr. Fusobacterium necrophorum endocarditis case report and review of the literature. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011; 69(2):192-5.

  12. Wingfield T, Blanchard TJ, Ajdukiewicz KM. Severe pneumonia and jaundice in a young man: An atypical presentation of an uncommon disease. J Med Microbiol. 2011; 60(Pt 9): 1391-4.

  13. O’Neil GL, Ogunsola FT, Brazier JS, Duerden BI. Modification of a PCR ribotyping method for application as a routine typing scheme for Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe. 1996; 2(4): 205-9.

  14. Tan ZL, Nagaraja TG, Chengappa MM. Biochemical and biological characterization of ruminal Fusobacterium necrophorum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994; 120(1-2): 81-6.

  15. Avila-Campos MJ, Sacchi CT, Whitney AM, Steigerwalt AG, Mayer LW. Arbitrarily primed-polymerase chain reaction for identification and epidemiologic subtyping of oral isolates of Fusobacterium nucleatum. J Periodontol. 1999; 70 (10): 1202-8.

  16. Rahmati A, Gal M, Northey G, Brazier JS. Subtyping of Clostridium difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 001 by repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR genomic fingerprinting. J Hosp Infect. 2005; 60(1): 56-60.

  17. Louws FJ, Fulbright DW, Stephens CT, De Bruijn FJ. Specific genomic fingerprints of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas pathovars and strains generated with repetitive sequences and PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol J. 1994; 60 (7): 2286-95.

  18. Mohapatra BR, Mazumder A. Comparative efficacy of five different REP-PCR methods to discriminate Escherichia coli populations in aquatic environments. Water Sci Technol. 2008; 58(3):537-47.