Identification of Mycoplasma synoviae by PCR and Culture Methods and Determination of the Prevalence of P1, P30, and P116 Virulence Genes in the Isolates

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Department of Microbiology, Shiraz branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Aims: Mycoplasma synoviae, as one of the main pathogens of birds, causes a lot of economic losses to the poultry industry. This study aimed to identify M. synoviae strains in clinical samples by PCR and culture methods.

Materials & Methods: A total of 135 samples were randomly collected from the respiratory tracts of female broilers in industrial poultry farms in Kerman, Iran during the first six months of 2016. Samples were cultured on Frey and PPLO broth media. Then PCR method was performed to identify Mycoplasma genus and synoviae species. Finally, multiplex PCR was performed to determine the prevalence of P1, P30, and P116 virulence genes.

Findings: In this study, 17 (32%) out of 53 poultry samples were positive for the presence of Mycoplasma genus by culture method, whereas according to the PCR results, 25 (47%) out of 53 samples were confirmed as Mycoplasma genus, among which 13 samples (25%) were identified as M. synoviae species. Among the strains confirmed as M. synoviae, the prevalence rate of P1, P30, and P116 genes was 7 (53.8%), 6 46.1%), and 5 (38.46%), respectively.

Conclusion: According to the PCR and culture methods results, the prevalence of M. synoviae strains was high in industrial poultry farms, Kerman, Iran. The PCR results revealed a higher prevalence rate for this bacterium, suggesting that this method may be more reliable than culture method.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Kleven SH, Ferguson-Noel N. Mycoplasma synoviae infection. Diseases of poultry. 2008;12:845-56.
2. Nasir Abbas MS, Muhammad N, ur Rahman S, Ahmad M, Niazi AT, Khalid A, et al. Seropositivity, Involvement in Suspected Cases of Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Comparative Efficacy of Various Sero-Diagnostic Tests of Mycoplasma Gallisepticum. J Appl Environ Biol Sci. 2018;8(3):137-41.
3. Suarez D. Avian encephalomyelitis. In (eds: Swayne DE, glisson Jr, McDougald Lr, Nolan LK, Suarez DL, Nair V) Diseases of Poultry 13th edn, Ames. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
4. Vardaman T. The resistance and carrier status of meat-type hens exposed to Mycoplasma synoviae. Poultry science. 1976;55(1):268-73.
5. Landman W, Feberwee A. Aerosol-induced Mycoplasma synoviae arthritis: the synergistic effect of infectious bronchitis virus infection. Avian Pathology. 2004;33(6):591-8.
6. Carnaghan R. Egg transmission of infectious synovitis. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics. 1961;71:279-85.
7. Fiorentin L, Mores M, Trevisol I, Antunes S, Costa J, Soncini R, et al. Test profiles of broiler breeder flocks housed in farms with endemic Mycoplasma synoviae infection. Brazilian journal of poultry science. 2003;5(1):37-43.
8. Noormohammadi AH, Hemmatzadeh F, Whithear KG. Safety and Efficacy of the Mycoplasma synoviae MS-H Vaccine in Turkeys. Avian diseases. 2007;51(2):550-4.
9. Ramírez AS, Naylor CJ, Hammond PP, Bradbury JM. Development and evaluation of a diagnostic PCR for Mycoplasma synoviae using primers located in the intergenic spacer region and the 23S rRNA gene. Veterinary microbiology. 2006;118(1-2):76-82.
10. Swayne DE. Laboratory manual for the isolation and identification of avian pathogens: American Association of Avian Pathologists, University of Pennsylvania; 1998.
11. Sakhaei D, Pourbakhsh S, Banani M, Lotfi M, Akhlaghi F, Asli E. Using PCR and culture methods for Mycoplasma testing in poliomyelitis vaccine. Archives of Razi Institute. 2009;64(2):109-14.
12. Pooladgar A, Looni R, Ghaemmaghami S, Pourbakhsh A, Ashtari A, Shirudi A. Isolation and identification of Mycoplasma agalactiae by culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from affected sheep to contagious agalactia of Khuzestan province, Iran. Archives of Razi Institute. 2015;70(1):21-7.
13. Lauerman LH, Hoerr FJ, Sharpton AR, Shah SM. Development and application of a polymerase chain reaction assay for Mycoplasma synoviae. Avian Diseases. 1993;37(3):829-34.
14. Feberwee A, Mekkes D, De Wit J, Hartman E, Pijpers A. Comparison of culture, PCR, and different serologic tests for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae infections. Avian diseases. 2005;49(2):260-8.
15. Behbahan NGG, Asasi K, Afsharifar A, Pourbakhsh S. Isolation and detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. Iranian Journal of veterinary research. 2005;6(2 (Ser. No. 12)):35-96.
16. Bayatzadeh M, Pourbakhsh S, Homayounimehr A, Ashtari A, Abtin A. Application of culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for isolation and identification of Mycoplasma synoviae on broiler chicken farms. 2011.
17. Elhamnia F, Banani M, Shokri G, Pourbakhsh S, Ashtari A. Detection of Mycoplasma synoviae infection in broiler breeder farms of Tehran province using PCR and culture methods. Archives of Razi Institute. 2010;65(2):75-81.
18. Buim MR, Buzinhani M, Yamaguti M, Oliveira RC, Mettifogo E, Timenetsky J, et al. Intraspecific variation in 16S rRNA gene of Mycoplasma synoviae determined by DNA sequencing. Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases. 2010;33(1):15-23.
19. Silveira RM, Fiorentin L, Marques EK. Polymerase chain reaction optimization for Mycoplasma gallisepticum and M. synoviae diagnosis. Avian diseases. 1996:218-22.
20. Gray MW, Sankoff D, Cedergren RJ. On the evolutionary descent of organisms and organelles: a global phylogeny based on a highly conserved structural core in small subunit ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 1984;12(14):5837-52.